In truth, I dont quite know how to begin the story I am about to tell. Let me start with this: I am real, flesh and bones, the director of Kunsthalle Basel
and curator of its program. I invited Chinese artist Yan Xing to create a new body of work for his first institutional solo exhibition in Switzerland. He conceived an exhibition that includes, as one of its many elements, a displaced, unremarkable object: the ceiling lamp from above my office desk. This decision impacts my daily work for the duration of the show. You might not have noticed the lamps curved, frosted glass cover and metal hardware, but now you know that their being in the show means they are not in my office, not lighting my way. These are facts, irrefutable and simple.
But here the story becomes complicated. Yan Xing, also of flesh and bones, has invented a fictive artist in whose exhibition, Dangerous Afternoon, you currently find yourself. Most things around you (save the real lamp of the real curator) were made by this fictive artist and installed by a fictive curator, whose personal tribulations haunt the exhibition. This curator, the story goes, is a devoted and happily married middle-aged man who one day falls, desperately and inconsolably, for a strangers feet. After a period of torment during which he concedes to his desire, the curator tries to convince the stranger to let him have his way with the latters feet. The stranger agrees, on one condition: the curator must give over his wife to the stranger for a night. A moral dilemma ensues: to consummate his desire, the curator must not only convince his wife to betray him, but convince her to do so in order that he, her husband, betray her in turn with the same man. This whirlwind of desire, torment, and duplicity, all unfolding during the preparation of the exhibition, as well as the fictive curators degrading relationship with the artist (stemming from his distraction and paranoia), are the backstory of Dangerous Afternoon.
I wanted to make a show about a curator undone by desire, Yan Xing declares. The result is a body of objects whose arrangement conspires to make libidinal intrigue palpable. A handful of photographs show closely cropped scenes: in one, a man is gently and lovingly engaged in cleaning the inside of another mans ear; in another, you see arms and hands (of two men?) holding a delicate potted plant. These are images of exquisite tension, printed in the inkiest black and white, some so dark that it takes a moment to decipher the image.
This tantalizing uncertainty fits the project as a whole, in which not knowing precisely what you are looking at (or where the lines between veracity and fiction are drawn) is the crucible around which the exhibition smolders.
Everything about its materialityfrom the oversize white-sand-filled ashtray; to the elongated copper devices, each topped with a porcupine quill and vaguely insinuating erotic use; to an embroidered silk handkerchief; to the frames of the photographsis refined, poised, elegant to the extreme. Yet, along the walls, scuff marks at about foot height are evidence of the strangers attempt to taunt and humiliate the lovesick curator. During the preparation of the exhibition, the stranger ordered the curator to crawl on his hands and knees along the edges of the space, and his shoes left the scuff marks. Regardless of this humiliation, the curator placed a guardrail in one area (the type used to protect valuable artifacts in museums) as if to elevate the markings to the status of art. Another railing appears around a hanging whistle, a cipher for the strangers domination of the curator, who allegedlygot whistled at as an order to lick a square of the exhibitions wooden floor (perhaps the very floor under your feet at this moment).
Along the walls of the main space, occasional nail holes testify to the curators removal of the artists original placement of certain works, suggesting indecision or rejection, a tussle during the installation. In the second space, a work-table, drawing implements, and the days newspaper signal work in progress; across from the table, smallish gray and white Cézanne-like paintings hang near a graphite wall mural. The paintings are slightly modified copies of existing historical scenes in which the artist has, according to the paranoid delusions of the curator, discovered the latters secret inner turmoil and depicted it. Ashamed and infuriated at being so discovered, the curator required that one of the paintings be removed from display and packed up (it stands, partially wrapped, in a corner).
Can the scenography of an exhibition expose the fraught mental and emotional life of the person installing it? Yan Xing represents his fictive curators desire almost as if it were an object in the room, keeping erotic tension close to the surface of his entire project. The final element in the exhibition is the curators own homemade video, recorded on his smartphone with trembling hands as he looked out the window of the very gallery in which the video is now shown. It is evidence of the fleeting, arranged meeting between his wife and the stranger whose feet he desires.
The two protagonists of the curators emotional drama meet and quickly walk off together on that dangerous afternoon.
If Dangerous Afternoon propels us into its storys uncertain, imagined future, it also includes clues for how its stage was set. Unavailable to visitors of the exhibition when the show opens, a several-hours-long film premieres on June 14, 2017, documenting a dinner for seven distinguished guests held several weeks before the show opened. They share an intimate repartee (the extent to which their tales are authentic or scripted remains unclear). One of them, the stranger, reveals how he met and received an illicit proposal by a local curator of an exhibition then about to open, as well as the strangers secret plans for him. No one believes his story, but in it lies a key to unraveling the complex narrative underlying the entire project.
Remember the office lamp? Like a hand that suddenly brushes yours in a movie theater while you are thoroughly engrossed in watching a film, the lampmy lampis a bit of the real puncturing the elaborate and convoluted artifice of the exhibition. And if everywhere in the exhibition the boundary between the artificial and the actual is deliberately muddled, this muddle is the very substance of Yan Xings practice. Across his body of workcomprised of installation, performance, photography, sculpture, and video fact and speculation, public and private, art object and display structure touch and blur. And fantastical backstories often take root. This exhibition is no exception. Here one artists oeuvre insinu- ates itself into another (invented) artists oeuvre, one curators work insinuates itself into another (invented) curators work, and indeed fiction insinuates itself into truthand vice versa. Truth is thus built up promiscuously, resplendently, only to be dissolved again.