NEW YORK, NY.-
In the current global environmentwith nature threatened now more than everhow is our contemporary landscape reimagined by artists? Landscapes after Ruskin: Redefining the Sublime explores this intriguing question through artworks that confront an increasingly sinister notion of the sublime. Curated by renowned photographer Joel Sternfeld, the exhibition features approximately 60 works by over 45 artists, including paintings, photographs, sculpture, installation, film, and video. Landscapes after Ruskin was organized by the Hall Art Foundation and is on view at New York Universitys Grey Art Gallery
from April 17 through July 7, 2018.
Works in the show span many stylesfrom realism to expressionism, abstraction to figurationrevealing the multiple ways that contemporary artists are addressing current environmental concerns. While early landscapists such as J. M. W. Turner, depicted the power of raw, unrestricted nature to overwhelm humanity, the artists featured in Landscapes after Ruskin are working in a climate of heightened anxiety, technological advancement, frequent natural disasters, and increasing human populations. The show includes works by established figures Joseph Beuys, Mary Corse, Eric Fischl, Anselm Kiefer, Bruce Nauman, Gerhard Richter, Ai Weiwei, Jane and Louise Wilson, and David Wojnarowicz alongside works by others who deserve to be better known, such as Naoya Hatakeyama, Dodo Jin Ming, Dora Longo Bahia, and Serban Savu.
Landscapes after Ruskin debuted at the Hall Art Foundations space in Reading, Vermont, in spring 2016 and was curated by artist Joel Sternfeld. As Sternfeld observes, For a few short years in the 19th century, it was possible to experience what we can now with hindsight regard as an innocent sublime. Now that the landscape has become a place of fear and danger, we have only a calamitous sublime to behold. This show poses an exciting challenge as we hope to bring attention to the global issues that face humanity and the environment today. Grey Art Gallery director Lynn Gumpert comments, We are very pleased that Landscapes after Ruskin will travel to the Grey Art Gallery. As a university museum, we experiment with different exhibition formats, and were thrilled to present one curated by such a thoughtful and knowledgeable artist as Joel.
John Ruskinan influential English art critic and social activist of the Victorian eraargued that the artists principal goal should be truth to nature. For Ruskin, this truth was more than just a technical representation of the natural world on canvas. Rather, he believed that all great art should depict the natural world as humanity experiences it. For example, the 19th-century artist J. M. W. Turner, whose work Ruskin championed, depicted the trees, mountains, sky, and water in his landscapes as ethereal and majesticbut also as overwhelming and, at times, threatening. Ruskin believed that Turner, in depicting landscape in a manner that elicited sensations of both beauty and terror, was able to render an authentic representation of the sublime, evoking feelings of awe and human insignificance.
At the same time that Ruskin was playing a crucial role in introducing the upper classes of the English-speaking world to the appreciation and collecting of art, he was also promoting his broader concerns about the planet, speaking out against industrial pollution and effectively becoming one of Europes first environmentalists. Similarly, Sternfeld transcends boundaries between art and nature, revealing both the humorous and the tragic effects that humanity has inflicted on the world. Well-known for his landmark 1987 book American Prospectsone of his many publicationsSternfeld combines both the sublime vistas of the vast American landscape with the strange emptiness of its mass-produced public architecture. Selecting works by other artists in the Hall and Hall Art Foundation collections, he discloses a complex contemporary landscape, one that is filled with competing dangers.
Landscapes after Ruskin begins with Gustave Courbets La vague (The Wave; c. 1869), a turbulent seascape painted in Étretat, Normandy, where the artist spent the summer of 1869 depicting the savage power of natural forces. Late 19th-century perspectives on the natural world such as this one understood humanity to be under the dominion of naturethe placating of which was considered necessary for continued human survival. During the 20th century, human activity came to be viewed as intricately linked to the forces of nature around us.
That humanity has established a new and complex relationship to nature is clear in Sternfelds selection of artworks in Landscape after Ruskin. For example, Naoya Hatakeyama, one of Japans most distinguished photographers, captures the technological forces used to control the natural world in his Atmos (#07909) (2003), in which clouds of pink-colored steam hover above a foundry in Camargue, France. An effect of the steelmaking process, the steam assumes a cloud-like, organic appearance that complicates the distinction between nature and industry. Similarly, Richard Longs Bowery Slate (2011)a sculpture made of cut-slate pieces laid down in a structured rectanglecontrasts the organic, natural imperfections of cut slate with the manmade invention of geometric shapes, revealing how human technology often reworks the worlds natural forces.
Many of the works in Landscapes after Ruskin confront the disasters that humanity has inflicted on the earth. In 1972, Joseph Beuys executed Save the Woods, an action he undertook with fellow citizens to protest the removal of forests around Düsseldorf. Photographic documentation of the event evokes a sense of nostalgia for the early phases of the environmental movement, reminding us of a time when there were still large areas of nature to save. More recent projects, such as Ai Weiweis gleaming black ceramic Oil Spills (2006), allude to the sort of humaninflicted disasters that early conservationists were trying to prevent, but that ultimately have become all too common. Like Ais New York Citywide exhibition Good Fences Make Good Neighbors, on view this past fall and winter, Oil Spills emphasizes his longstanding interest in representing global crises, especially those that affect the most underprivileged communities.
Exploring various interpretations of the sublime, the exhibition presents several works proposing that, in the post-industrial era, terrorism may be the sublimes most spectacular forma new landscape riven by destruction and filled with constant surveillance. For example, Carlos Motta made his series of grainy photographs entitled Public Domain (2004) while in residence across the street from Ground Zero. Monitoring visitors who once may have visited the site for its impressive structures but now come to pay homage to a landscape of wreckage, Motta frames the culture of surveillance as central to the contemporary landscape.
Landscapes after Ruskin also presents Joel Sternfelds first film, London Bridge (2016). The piece was filmed at Lake Havasu in Arizona, where a real-estate developer purchased the early 19th-century bridge, transported it from London, and reassembled it at the lake. Now a major tourist destination, the bridge stars in Sternfelds film, where a gondolier dressed in traditional Venetian clothing sings arias in Italian as he maneuvers around the bridge, steering his craft past motorboats filled with bikini-clad partyers gyrating to thumping disco music. Eventually, Sternfeld reveals that the gondolier is an American who realized an opportunity to cash in by providing a taste of Venice in Arizona. Spanning a day on the lake, the film includes a Porta Potti toilet break and a siesta. Crumpled beer cans and laser-disco effects clash with Sternfelds evocation of Italian vedute of the Grand Canal.
By focusing on the modern seascape of Lake Havasu, Sternfelds film provides an appropriate coda to the exhibition, demonstrating how our perception of the landscape has significantly changed since Courbet painted the all-powerful ocean at Normandy. Working in an era that scholars have dubbed the Anthropocenein which humanity itself is a significant geological forcethe artists exhibited in Landscapes after Ruskin have re-envisioned the contemporary landscape as intricately connected with our daily lives. In a world overwhelmed by human industry and development, Sternfeld demonstrates how artists can discover unexpected beauties associated with nature, and in so doing, are able to invoke a new sense of the sublime.