NEW YORK (NYT NEWS SERVICE).-
Pam Rorke Levy has resigned as chairwoman of the San Francisco Art Institute, a 150-year-old college that has struggled over the past year to emerge from a multimillion-dollar debt and declining enrollment despite its history of training artists such as Kehinde Wiley, Catherine Opie and Annie Leibovitz.
I feel I can step back, Levy said in a statement Thursday in which she expressed optimism that debt restructuring and new leadership would mean that SFAI has the runway to rebuild itself.
Her departure comes amid criticism over discussions of the potential sale of a Diego Rivera mural worth $50 million that would have given the institute a way to close its budget gap. That move now seems to be on hold because of an effort to give the mural landmark status.
The financial pressures had motivated the Board of Regents of the University of California to step in last fall to help by buying the institutes $19.7 million of debt from a private bank, a step designed to prevent a public sale of the schools Chestnut Street campus and its art collection.
The institute is cooperating with an audit of its finances by the state attorney generals office, which is reviewing the past seven years of operations.
The chairwoman, whose six-year term expired last summer, had stayed on to support SFAI through the additional challenges caused by the pandemic, she said in the statement. She has defended her efforts, saying she has acted to save the school and that she was taking necessary steps to keep afloat one of the last colleges on the West Coast exclusively dedicated to contemporary art.
Like other small colleges and arts institutions across our country, we face formidable challenges, she wrote this month in a statement to the San Francisco legislators who voted to initiate landmark designation of the Rivera mural to block any potential sale, against the schools objections. As fiduciaries of SFAI, the trustees are obligated to consider and pursue all options for putting our assets to work including the mural.
But critics say the boards efforts to manage its financial crisis may have jeopardized the schools future. One of them has objected to a decision at a Dec. 17 board meeting when trustees voted to spend $1.5 million from restricted endowment funds, which the current board chairman says they understood to be a bridge loan that would be paid back.
John Sanger, a trustee emeritus and retired lawyer, cautioned during the board meeting that, under state law, the school needed approval from the donors of the funds or the state attorney generals office before it could spend restricted funds for a purpose not designated by the donors.
Another former trustee, Tom Loughlin, raised similar concerns about the use of funds before resigning Jan. 16 from a committee created by the board to revise the schools governance. That committee dissolved after sharing its concerns about the schools financial situation with the broader community and calling for Levys resignation.
I have seen their numbers, and they have a giant hole in their budget, Loughlin, an artist and nonpracticing lawyer, said. There are students paying tuition right now to a school that has projected it could run out of money by April.
According to Levy, the schools legal counsel advised that the boards decision on the restricted funds did not require the approval of donors or the states attorney general.
One expert in nonprofit law said otherwise. Douglas M. Mancino, a former chairman of a committee with the American Bar Association focused on issues affecting tax-exempt organizations, described the use of restricted endowment funds in this case as unusual and very problematic.
Using funds that are donor-restricted for something other than their intended purpose would be a breach of fiduciary duty, Mancino said. You could probably get a court to eventually rule on the issue, but its a process you would have to go through. You cant just unilaterally use those funds without approval.
According to the institutes new chairman, Lonnie Graham, a photographer, the board reexamined its use of the restricted funds recently and voted to secure a new loan, providing more than $7 million to help the institute survive the fiscal year and to restore endowment funds.
I want to make sure the school has a future, Graham said. We are trying, we are really trying. But we are not trying to do anything illegal.
© 2021 The New York Times Company