The First Art Newspaper on the Net   Established in 1996 Sunday, July 5, 2020


Pentagon rules out striking Iranian cultural sites, contradicting Trump
The "Si-o-Se Pol" bridge (33 Arches bridge) over the Zayandeh Rud river in Isfahan. ATTA KENARE / AFP.

by Peter Baker and Maggie Haberman



WASHINGTON (NYT NEWS SERVICE ).- Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper sought to douse an international outcry Monday by ruling out military attacks on cultural sites in Iran if the conflict with Tehran escalates further, despite President Donald Trump’s threat to destroy some of the country’s treasured icons.

Esper acknowledged that striking cultural sites with no military value would be a war crime, putting him at odds with the president, who insisted such places would be legitimate targets. Trump’s threats generated condemnation at home and abroad while deeply discomfiting U.S. military leaders who have made a career of upholding the laws of war.

“We will follow the laws of armed conflict,” Esper said at a news briefing at the Pentagon when asked if cultural sites would be targeted as the president had suggested over the weekend. When a reporter asked if that meant “no” because the laws of war prohibit targeting cultural sites, Esper agreed. “That’s the laws of armed conflict.”

The furor was a classic controversy of Trump’s creation, the apparent result of an impulsive threat and his refusal to back down in the face of criticism. When Trump declared Saturday that the United States had identified 52 potential targets in Iran if it retaliates for the American drone strike that killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani, none of those targets qualified as cultural sites, according to an administration official who asked not to be identified correcting the president.

Nonetheless, when Trump casually said on Twitter that they included sites “very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture,” the resulting uproar only got his back up. Rather than simply say that cultural sites were not actually being targeted, the official said, he decided to double down the next day with reporters flying with him on Air Force One, scoffing at the idea that Iran could “kill our people” while “we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site,” saying, “It doesn’t work that way.”

The comments drew protests from Iran and other American adversaries who said they showed that Trump is the aggressor — and not just against Iran’s government but against its people, its history and its very nationhood. Even some of America’s allies weighed in, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain breaking with Trump by issuing a statement through an aide warning against targeting antiquities.

Military leaders were left in the awkward position of trying to reaffirm their commitment to generations of war-fighting rules without angering a volatile commander in chief by contradicting him. Trump’s remarks unsettled even some of his allies, who considered them an unnecessary distraction at a time when the president should be focusing attention on Iran’s misdeeds rather than promising some of his own.

“We’re not at war with the culture of the Iranian people,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., one of the president’s staunchest supporters in Congress, said Monday. “We’re in a conflict with the theology, the ayatollah and his way of doing business.”

Graham, a retired military lawyer in the Air Force Reserve, said he delivered that message to Trump in a telephone call Monday. “I think the president saying ‘we will hit you hard’ is the right message,” he said. “Cultural sites is not hitting them hard; it’s creating more problems. We’re trying to show solidarity with the Iranian people.”

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Trump’s threats would only encourage despots of the world to target antiquities themselves.

“America is better than that, and President Trump is flat-out wrong to threaten attacks on historic places of cultural heritage,” said Reed, a former platoon leader in the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division. “Destroying some of these culturally significant Iranian sites wouldn’t be seen as just an attack against the regime in Tehran, it could be construed as an attack on history and humanity.”

Iran, home to one of humanity’s most storied ancient civilizations, has 22 cultural sites designated on the World Heritage List by UNESCO, the United Nations cultural organization, including the ruins of Persepolis, the capital of the Achaemenid Empire later conquered by Alexander the Great. Others include Tchogha Zanbil, the remnants of the holy city of the Kingdom of Elam, and a series of Persian gardens that have their roots in the times of Cyrus the Great.

The United States is a signatory to a 1954 international agreement to protect cultural property in armed conflict and has been a leader in condemning rogue nations and groups that destroy antiquities, including the Islamic State’s destruction of sites in Mosul, Iraq, and Palmyra, Syria, and the Taliban’s demolition of the famed Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan in 2001.

Experts said that what Trump described would likewise violate international law. “We and others accused ISIS of war crimes when they did this,” said Jeh C. Johnson, a former secretary of homeland security under President Barack Obama, using another name for the Islamic State. “Certainly, in aggravated circumstances, it should be considered a war crime.”

Johnson, who previously served as the top lawyer at the Pentagon, and others said there could be situations that are murkier, if the actual cultural value was less clear or it was being used as a military facility. Still, Johnson said, “my guess is his national security lawyers did not vet that tweet.”

Indeed, the president’s advisers ever since have sought to deny that he was actually making a threat even though his initial tweet said the sites — including those of cultural importance — “WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD” if Iran responded to Soleimani’s killing.

“President Trump didn’t say he’d go after a cultural site,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo insisted the next day on Fox News. “Read what he said very closely.”

But just hours later, Trump made very clear that he thought cultural sites were in fact legitimate targets. “They’re allowed to kill our people,” he told the reporters on Air Force One as he flew back to Washington from his winter holiday in Florida. “They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way.”

By Monday, the White House was again denying that Trump actually made a threat. “He didn’t say he’s targeting cultural sites,” Kellyanne Conway, the president’s counselor, told reporters. “He said that he was openly asking the question why in the world they’re allowed to maim people, put out roadside bombs, kill our people, torture our people.”

© 2020 The New York Times Company










Today's News

January 8, 2020

Ancient wine measuring table unearthed in Jerusalem

George Grosz's political masterpiece 'Gefährliche Straße' to be offered at auction for the first time

Palmer Museum of Art announces its 2020 exhibition lineup

Walrus shortage led to medieval Norse collapse: study

Pentagon rules out striking Iranian cultural sites, contradicting Trump

Hauser and Wirth exhibits works by Alexander Calder in St. Moritz

Catherine Gund's AGGIE, a portrait of Agnes Gund, receives world premiere at Sundance Film Festival

Elizabeth Wurtzel, 'Prozac Nation' author, is dead at 52

Record 2.3 million people visited Auschwitz in 2019

When he was good, he was breathtaking

'Good Morning, America' by Mark Power exhibition opens at Magnum Print Room, London

Eduard Planting Gallery presents 'A tribute to Terry O'Neill'

Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen appoints new director

Durden and Ray opens an exhibition that explores the connections between disparate ideas and media

Octavia Art Gallery opens an exhibition of paintings by Pierre Bergian and sculptures by Christian Hootsell

Yorkshire Sculpture Park presents new work by British artist Saad Qureshi

First major monographic exhibition devoted to the German artist Charlotte Posenenske on view in Barcelona

The Florida Aquarium names Debborah Luke, PhD Senior Vice President of Conservation

Antique lighting & fine art collection to lead Fontaine's Auction Gallery's first sale of the year

French publisher pulls books by writer accused of underage rape

FBA Futures 2020 features contemporary figurative painting, sculpture and drawing by new graduates

Foundation for Contemporary Arts announces The Helen Frankenthaler Award for Painting

Illuminating musical seesaws transform Broadway pedestrian plazas into glowing winter wonderland

What your taste in music says about you

Biggest Art Sales of the Decade

Things to Do in Tennessee

Where to Invest Your Money

The colors of semi precious stone bracelets - what do they mean?

Your 200 Website Strategy Must Include These 5 Things

How To Present Your Keynote Speech At An Art Conference




Museums, Exhibits, Artists, Milestones, Digital Art, Architecture, Photography,
Photographers, Special Photos, Special Reports, Featured Stories, Auctions, Art Fairs,
Anecdotes, Art Quiz, Education, Mythology, 3D Images, Last Week, .

 



Founder:
Ignacio Villarreal
(1941 - 2019)
Editor & Publisher: Jose Villarreal
Art Director: Juan José Sepúlveda Ramírez

Buy tramadol online
sa gaming free credit

Royalville Communications, Inc
produces:

ignaciovillarreal.org avemariasound.org juncodelavega.com facundocabral-elfinal.org
Founder's Site. The most varied versions
of this beautiful prayer.
Hommage
to a Mexican poet.
Hommage
       

The First Art Newspaper on the Net. The Best Versions Of Ave Maria Song Junco de la Vega Site Ignacio Villarreal Site
Tell a Friend
Dear User, please complete the form below in order to recommend the Artdaily newsletter to someone you know.
Please complete all fields marked *.
Sending Mail
Sending Successful