PARIS.- What do you know about Russian theater director Konstantin Stanislavski? If your answer doesnt go much further than He designed a method for training actors, you are much like the audience members who were recently mystified by parts of Our Life in Art, a highly anticipated collaboration between American playwright and director Richard Nelson and Théâtre du Soleil, in Paris.
Its title is a nod to My Life in Art, an autobiography by Stanislavski that first came out in English in the 1920s. The Our refers to the renowned company he co-founded, the Moscow Art Theater, which, in 1923, embarked on a lengthy tour of the United States. In this new play, presented in collaboration with the multidisciplinary Festival dAutomne, Nelson imagines a day the company spent between performances in Chicago.
Onstage, Stanislavski and his 10-person ensemble who mostly use Russian nicknames for one another bicker, eat dinner and talk about Russia and the United States. There are oblique references to the 1917 Russian Revolution and its aftermath; to Anton Chekhov, whose plays the Moscow Art Theater championed; and to the impact the tour and Stanislavskis theories had on American art.
But it takes much of the play to even establish that one of the characters was Chekhovs wife. The complex historical context to Our Life in Art is rarely addressed head-on, and wont necessarily be obvious to Parisian theatergoers, most of whom are also encountering Nelsons work for the first time. While he is a prominent figure in American theater, with several dozen plays to his name (including a recent 12-part project, Rhinebeck Panorama), this is the first production Nelson has directed in French.
The sense that Our Life in Art wasnt meant for its current audience is appropriate. Nelson originally intended for the play to be performed in Russia. He made several trips to the country, in 2020 and 2021, to start work on a production there, Nelson explains in a playbill interview.
Russias full-scale invasion of Ukraine upended these plans. Not long afterward, the Théâtre du Soleil one of Frances top theater companies, led by renowned director Ariane Mnouchkine came calling, and Nelson offered Our Life in Art to the company.
Before the performance started, Mnouchkine explained that there were donation boxes in the hall to raise money for humanitarian relief in Ukraine. In the playbill, Nelson also said that the war had added another dimension to the play, a feeling of powerlessness.
On opening night, there was a palpable sense of curiosity at La Cartoucherie, the companys home in Vincennes, a Paris suburb. Mnouchkine has personally overseen nearly every production performed by the Théâtre du Soleil since 1964, and Nelson is only the third outside director to work with the troupe in 59 years. The last was Robert Lepage, from Canada, whose 2018 work Kanata Episode 1 The Controversy brought, well, controversy.
The Théâtre du Soleil tends to overhaul its own venue for every new production, and Our Life in Art is no exception. Instead of the usual auditorium, the play is staged in a narrow space flanked by audience members on both sides. (The seating, akin to tiered pews, is exceptionally uncomfortable.)
This allows Nelson, who often works in the round, to create a new level of intimacy with the actors. Whereas Mnouchkine likes sweeping, large-scale tableaux, Nelson prefers to zoom in on smaller situations and conversations.
Around a large table, a couple, Nina and Vassily, trade barbs about Vassilys cheating tendencies. Pyotr, a younger actor, is reprimanded for drinking too much and playing Lopakhin, a central character in Chekhovs The Cherry Orchard, too coarsely. Masha, another company member, cooks pelmeni, Russian dumplings, for a celebratory dinner, during which everyone toasts the 25th anniversary of the Moscow Art Theater.
Like the company onstage, the Théâtre du Soleil is an ensemble theater, with a permanent troupe of actors and a singular vision, sustained over decades. Its players have a different kind of rapport than freelancers: When the characters sit down to eat together, their banter feels entirely natural. Nelson brings out a welcome new side of them, more casual than Mnouchkines directing style.
Our Life in Art really shines when Nelson plays up the contrast between the artists lives and the ideological pressure they were under in the Soviet Union. The play is bookended by two letters Stanislavski wrote to Josef Stalin in the 1930s, read onstage by actor Arman Saribekyan. In them, Stanislavski praises the great Communist Party and the spring of life it supposedly brought to Russian art. Thats why I love my homeland, he says.
Saribekyan explains that Stanislavski signed the letters under duress, and that their sentiment is purposely at odds with the restrained, laconic director we witness in the play, as performed by Maurice Durozier. Stanislavski grew up in an affluent family under the czars before adjusting to the communist system after the Revolution, and Nelson touches on the re-education that Stanislavski had to endure.
There is a sense, in Our Life In Art, that Stanislavski and his touring actors are trapped between ruthless American businessmen who rig the contracts to put all the financial risk on the company and the looming threat of being deemed unpatriotic when they go home. The artists interactions with Russian emigres in the United States are reported as suspicious in the Soviet press, and clippings are sent to the company as a warning of sorts.
In scenes like these, art and ideology collide. At one point, Stanislavski makes a speech about the players shared craft, their ability to zoom in on gestures and create art through verisimilitude, rather than through ideas. This is also what Nelson does in Our Life in Art, but that means that many things from the politics of the time to shifting expectations of theater in Soviet Russia go unexplained. Making them more accessible would only enhance the experience.
Our Life in Art: Through March 3, 2024 at the Théâtre du Soleil, Paris; theatre-du-soleil.fr.
This article originally appeared in
The New York Times.