A portrait's subject emerges as artist
The First Art Newspaper on the Net    Established in 1996 Thursday, November 14, 2024


A portrait's subject emerges as artist
Patrons view Diego Velázquez’s 1650 portrait of Juan de Pareja, his longtime slave and studio assistant, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, April 4, 2023. In the exhibit “Juan de Pareja, Afro-Hispanic Painter,” Pareja’s own art and personal history take center stage. (Lila Barth/The New York Times)

by Jason Farago



NEW YORK, NY.- Two artists in Rome: travelers, Spaniards, on a mission to learn from the best and buy for the king. Are they friends? Not that. Colleagues? Only in a very strained manner of speaking. When Diego Rodríguez de Silva y Velázquez arrives in Italy in 1649, tasked by Philip IV to bring new artworks and plaster casts back to Spain, the painter brings along his assistant Juan de Pareja, who has been enslaved in Velázquez’s household and studio for nearly 20 years. The two sailed over together, from Málaga to Genoa, as part of a royal flotilla; they visited Milan, Venice, Florence; and now they are setting up a studio in Rome, where Pareja stretches the canvases, grinds pigments into oils, and possibly paints replicas too.

That summer in Italy Velázquez asks his acolyte to sit for a portrait: asks or, more likely, compels. He paints Pareja in three-quarter profile. He has him cross his right arm in front of his chest, like a military commander. Pareja’s dark cape and black hair blend into the background, but a large white collar frames a face painted in quick, free strokes of coppery brown.

The palette is somber, the light is muted, but out of the darkness we see Pareja’s keen gaze. Such nobility. Such preoccupation. As contemporary painter Julie Mehretu has observed, the portrait is an “incredible contradiction.” In those open brushstrokes, she said, Velázquez could somehow “capture the complete humanity of someone” he treated as “not completely human in the same level.”

The portrait of Juan de Pareja astonished Rome in 1650 — a jubilee year, during which Velázquez signed the document that would make Pareja a free man. It’s enjoyed a prime position at the Metropolitan Museum of Art since 1971, when its purchase (for $5.5 million, $40 million-ish in today’s dollars) was trumpeted on the front page of The New York Times. Less trumpeted, then and also now, was Pareja’s own career following his emancipation. He became an artist in his own right, and his style diverged in surprising ways from his former enslaver’s: lighter, in higher spirits, quite his own.

In “Juan de Pareja: Afro-Hispanic Painter,” a show of concentrated insight now on view in the Met’s Lehman wing, we at last come to grips with one of the first European artists of African descent whose works survive today. Pareja’s paintings, hanging alongside Velázquez’s, are fine if not remarkable specimens of the later Spanish Baroque, though I’ve got to be fair: In Velázquez’s company, just about anyone else will look second-tier. (Quietly enough, “Juan de Pareja” is also the largest exhibition of paintings by Velázquez to appear in New York in 20 years, with 10 canvases painted or probably painted by his hand.) But the show is playing for bigger stakes than a simple rediscovery of Pareja as painter. It’s about how things get made, and who gets to make them; about freedom and violence, creative labor and physical labor, the building blocks of culture we miss when we fixate on genius.

In a similar way to “Posing Modernity” / “Le Modèle Noir,” the landmark exhibitions of 2018 and 2019 on Black models in French painting, “Juan de Pareja” does its most radical work by simply unearthing the facts. Who worked for whom. Under what conditions. In what society. Some of its revelations were hidden deep in the archive, such as baptism records of children enslaved by the Velázquez family. Other facts, more embarrassingly for us, hid in plain sight on the walls of the Prado. The museum in Madrid lent two of the five Parejas here: “The Calling of Saint Matthew” (1661), whose bright tones renounce Velázquez’s shadows, and “The Baptism of Christ” (1667), a thronging tableau of saints, angels and lambs. Another 18 paintings, attributed to Pareja with greater or lesser firmness, appear in the catalog.

In a masterstroke of historical framing, the organizers — David Pullins, an associate curator in the Met’s European painting department, and Vanessa K. Valdés, a provost and professor at City College — have interwoven their research with another voice: that of Arturo Schomburg, the Puerto Rican intellectual who sought out Pareja 100 years ago, when other Americans barely bothered. Schomburg’s writings on Afro-Hispanic culture ripple through the wall texts; photographs he took in Seville and Madrid spotlight the multicultural exchanges of Spain’s Golden Age.

Pareja was born sometime around 1608 in Andalusia, where slavery was commonplace. Seville had an enslaved population — mostly of North African and sub-Saharan African origin, but also Jews and other minorities — of 10% or more, as well as a large community of free people of color. It was among the most diverse cities in 17th century Europe, described as a tablero de ajedrez: a “chessboard” on which white and Black residents crisscrossed with an international cast of merchants, sailors and servants. Look at the massive Seville cityscape here, by an unknown painter from around 1660, in which men of lighter and darker skin tones gossip and gallivant on the riverbank as galleons sail by.

Most likely Pareja was the son of an enslaved woman and a white Spaniard father, perhaps her enslaver. In this show’s subtitle Pareja is described as “Afro-Hispanic.” That’s certainly probable, given his appearance in his portraits and the demographics of Andalusian slavery, but there are no surviving documents to prove it, and he may also have been partially Morisco — descended from the Iberian Peninsula’s forcibly converted Muslim population. In the art of Hapsburg Spain, when the trans-Atlantic slave trade was immature and the pseudoscience of racial categories was only starting to take hold, skin tones could be chosen to express religious affiliation rather than capture likeness, with Christians depicted in lighter tones and Muslims in darker ones.




In boomtown Seville, enslaved labor powered the artisanal workshops of goldsmiths, ceramists, carpenters, illustrators — and painters. Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, for example, enslaved six people, described in a dowry agreement as “white,” “Berber” and “Black.” And as early as 1617, when the teenage Velázquez painted a kitchen maid with umber skin and a white kerchief, Spain clearly had developed an art market for paintings depicting people of color. (All three surviving versions of this motif are here.)

Documents testify to Velázquez’s ownership of Pareja from at least the early 1630s, when his name appears as part of the painter’s circle at court in Madrid. Early biographers doubted that Pareja would have been allowed to paint in Velázquez’s studio — and concocted fantasy stories that he painted in secret, so well that when King Philip saw his work he ordered him set free. The reality is more prosaic, but those myths were getting at something important. They pointed to a new estimation of painting in European society of the 17th century, elevated from artisanal labor into a fine art. Painting, once a craft like goldsmithing or wood-turning, was being recast as a noble, humanistic enterprise, and a painter like Velázquez could become the confidant of the most powerful king in Europe.

It’s that new humanistic definition of painting that gives Velázquez’s portrait of Pareja such paradoxical force. He has painted a person over whom he had property rights, but with the finesse he usually reserved for princes. The arched eyebrows, the frank gaze. The gently pursed lips, as if about to breathe or to speak. Velázquez has depicted Pareja with the psychological and emotional individuality that ought to be the mark of human equality — and he’s done it under the most unequal conditions imaginable.

Nine months after Velázquez painted his enslaved assistant, he freed him. It’s stunning to see here, in front of Pareja’s portrait, the very document of his liberation: manumission papers, lent from the archives of the city of Rome, guaranteeing in Latin that he would no longer be “bound to any service, servitude or slavery to Mr. Diego himself and his descendants.” (The document specified four more years of enslavement — a standard formula since ancient Roman times — meaning Pareja returned to Spain still in bondage.) On the opposite wall is a version of Velázquez’s portrait of Pope Innocent X: the ultimate painterly commission, which he’d been gunning for since his arrival in Rome and for which the Pareja portrait functioned as a job application.

When Pareja began his own career as a free man, he had experience rare for any artist outside Italy, and firsthand knowledge of both royal portraiture and classical antecedents. In his “Calling of Saint Matthew,” from 1661, almost 11 feet wide, the composition is blocky and stagy, the spaces awkwardly compressed, but the fabrics are rich with the colors of Venice (and maybe also Flanders, then under Spanish rule). The table is draped with a Turkish carpet, and the jewelry, the furs, the gold ewers and salvers all insinuate a rising global commodities trade — one of those “commodities” being people like the painter himself.

Along with the pointing Jesus and the disbelieving Matthew, Pareja inserted at the picture’s far left a self-portrait, almost in the same three-quarter profile that Velázquez chose a decade before. His hairline receded a bit in the interim, and he painted his own skin with lighter shades than his enslaver used (though again, this may have nothing to do with physiognomy). In his hand is a paper, defiantly thrust toward the picture plane. Juan de Pareja made this in 1661. He made it on his own terms.

“History must restore what slavery took away,” Arturo Schomburg wrote in his 1925 classic “The Negro Digs Up His Past” — a line this show prints above Velázquez’s portrait of Pareja. If that large-letter quotation has a whiff of the classroom, it does at least set a much higher standard for cultural achievement than we’ve accepted in the last few years. Research, rediscovery, facts forgotten, facts never known: this is the enterprise we are embarked on, and I’m afraid it takes longer and costs more than statements of “solidarity” and “centering” you could outsource to ChatGPT. But that’s the commitment we make when we take the lives of others seriously. There is no express lane to see the truth in painting.



Juan de Pareja, Afro-Hispanic Painter

Through July 16 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 Fifth Ave., Manhattan, (212) 535-7710; metmuseum.org.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.










Today's News

April 9, 2023

A portrait's subject emerges as artist

Gagosian exhibits a selection of neon works by Douglas Gordon

Hauser & Wirth Zurich present Berlinde De Bruyckere's 'A simple prophecy'

Royal document Charles II's "The Declaration of Breda" to come to auction at Sotheby's

Ateneum Art Museum unveils a comprehensive rehang of the permanent collection

Treasure trove of unseen art - led by Miró rediscovery - heads to Sotheby's Paris

Exhibition explores the various theatrical and stage-related forms of expression in art since the 1960s

Modern Art Oxford opens the largest institutional show in the UK by Carey Young

Turner Auctions and Appraisals presents The Pebble Beach Estate of Normal Lausten

Foundling Museum announces new Director

Exhibition brings to light the works stored in the off-limits spaces where they are conserved

The exhibition 'Beauty and the Unexpected' opens at Nationalmuseum

'Virginia Overton: Tulip' to opened yesterday with reception at Hypermaremma

Harry Lorayne, dazzling master of Total Recall, is dead at 96

Marvel superhero and Indigenous actress holds fast to Maya roots

In 'Hamnet,' Shakespeare's wife takes the spotlight, at last

Significant drawings from the Al Hirschfeld Foundation top Heritage's April Illustration Art event

Spectacular copy of Duck Hunt, Nintendo's 1985 entry to the U.S. home market, tops Heritage's Video Game Auction

A Pakistani film, banned at home, is celebrated abroad

John Moran Auctioneers ends sale of Jewelry from the Estate of Lady Leslie Ridley-Tree

Marathon of record-setting prices for rare petroliana at Morphy's

Discover the Must-See Art Exhibitions of 2023

How Custom Keychains and Washi Tape Can Strengthen Your Brand Identity?

What is the history and significance of royal portraits, and why are they still relevant today?

Tips on how to choose the right plumbing services:




Museums, Exhibits, Artists, Milestones, Digital Art, Architecture, Photography,
Photographers, Special Photos, Special Reports, Featured Stories, Auctions, Art Fairs,
Anecdotes, Art Quiz, Education, Mythology, 3D Images, Last Week, .

 



Founder:
Ignacio Villarreal
(1941 - 2019)
Editor & Publisher: Jose Villarreal
Art Director: Juan José Sepúlveda Ramírez
Writer: Ofelia Zurbia Betancourt

Attorneys
Truck Accident Attorneys
Accident Attorneys
Holistic Dentist
Abogado de accidentes
สล็อต
สล็อตเว็บตรง

Royalville Communications, Inc
produces:

ignaciovillarreal.org juncodelavega.com facundocabral-elfinal.org
Founder's Site. Hommage
to a Mexican poet.
Hommage
       

The First Art Newspaper on the Net. The Best Versions Of Ave Maria Song Junco de la Vega Site Ignacio Villarreal Site Parroquia Natividad del Señor
Tell a Friend
Dear User, please complete the form below in order to recommend the Artdaily newsletter to someone you know.
Please complete all fields marked *.
Sending Mail
Sending Successful