NEW YORK (NYT NEWS SERVICE).-
Tucked into a small gallery in the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh is a plexiglass cube filled with computer parts. Its about 16 inches on each side, reminiscent of a Donald Judd box, updated for the digital era.
Its also an open Wi-Fi hot spot to which you can link your phone. But before your phone connects to the internet, it routes traffic through the Tor Projects network, which anonymizes your phone, location and activity. Once you connect, you can move through the museum totally untraced. This sculpture, titled Autonomy Cube, is the kind of object for which Trevor Paglen, 45, has become known, as one of the foremost artists drawing attention to the power and ubiquity of surveillance technology.
Its part of a series that I think about as impossible objects, he said of his latest work in a recent phone interview. He has also launched a satellite sculpture into space that he described as a giant mirror in the sky, with no commercial or scientific value, one with purely aesthetic value.
He has also sent a time capsule with 100 images from throughout human history into perpetual orbit, micro-etched onto a disc and encased in a gold-plated shell. These objects might be thought of as impossible because there is no incentive for their creation in a world where technological development has been commercialized, where surveillance is commonplace and where space remains largely militarized. Is making them, then, an act of optimism?
I wouldnt use the word optimistic, but what youre getting at with that word is there, Paglen said. Theyre very self-contradictory and contradictory of the systems theyre in.
Autonomy Cube is installed at the Carnegie Museum in an exhibition of Paglens work titled Opposing Geometries. Organized as part of the 2020 Hillman Photography Initiative, an incubator for innovative thinking about photography, the show will be on view until March.
Like almost all of Paglens work, the exhibition takes contemporary technologies as its central subject, but many of the works here look backward, too. The show, which features photographs, overarchingly demonstrates that even though surveillance and computer vision and machine learning have become todays buzzwords, they have a long history that is bound up with photography.
The exhibition includes images from Paglens series They Took the Faces From the Accused and the Dead ... which assembled thousands of photos from a National Institute of Standards and Technology database, an archive of mug shots that was used to test early facial recognition software programs without the subjects consent. In Paglens versions, parts of the subjects faces are blocked out, leaving haunting square-shaped holes that are at once a reference to their stolen identities and also a means of returning them to anonymity.
The show is looking at historical forms of photography and the relationship between those forms of photography and different kinds of police power or state power, Paglen said. What is that relationship between photography and power?
The multiplicity of meanings in Paglens work are part of their appeal to technologists and thinkers. Theres lots of rhetoric about how AI is going to change the world, and people dont realize how much technology has already changed the world and then when they do come to realize it, they often have the reaction of being scared or otherwise feeling powerless, said David Danks, a philosophy professor at Carnegie Mellon University whose work focuses on ethics and technology and who is on the creative team of the Hillman Photography Initiative. I think a really important aspect of Trevors work is that it doesnt just elicit a reaction, it doesnt just educate. I think Trevors very good about indirectly giving people clues about how to be empowered.
Many of the works in this show are extensions of Paglens longtime interest in the relationship between photography and artificial intelligence including his ImageNet Roulette, a digital art project and app that went viral last fall and allowed users to upload their faces to see how AI might label them. Often the results were racist, sexist and otherwise stereotypical a shock to users, which prompted ImageNet, a leading image database, to remove half a million images.
In Opposing Geometries, though, Paglen who has a Ph.D. in geography and an MFA is thinking about the history of images as well as the future. If you look at these histories of technical image-making, theyre always, if not part of a military project, adjacent to one and nurtured by it, so in some ways we have these very contiguous histories, he said.
Among these intertwined histories are that of photography and the settlement of the American West. While indelible images of places like Yosemite taken in the 1860s have long been ingrained in American mythmaking, Paglen is interested in them as early assertions of military control. The War Department (now known as Defense) funded several reconnaissance missions into the West in the 1860s and 1870s and sent photographers as part of a push to capture the new territory. Yet these sublime photos, Paglen said, were like the eyes of the state on a new territory, a theme he explores in his Carnegie Museum exhibition.
Some of Paglens photographs do look uncannily like Carleton Watkins early photographs of Yosemite and were in fact created using a historical printing process called albumen. But he also ran the photographs through computer vision algorithms, which struggle to identify objects in their natural environment, generating instead lines and shapes on the images surface. The resulting photos are once hyper-modern and antiquarian, tying the past and present through technology.
There are more pictures today made by machines for machines to interpret than all the pictures that have existed for humankind, said Dan Leers, the curator of Opposing Geometries. But rather than throwing his hands up, Trevor is going back through the history of photography and, in some cases, specifically reusing existing images and, in other cases, acknowledging historical processes in his making of these pictures.
This is the first new exhibition that will open at the Carnegie Museum post-lockdown, and its themes have particular resonance after months when our lives moved mostly online. Paglen, whose main studio is in Berlin, and who normally travels frequently, spent the lockdown in Brooklyn, where he has a secondary studio.
Id never used Zoom before this, he said. So what is this layer of technology that has become so much a part of the ways in which we interact with each other? Especially when these forms of technology are also surveillance platforms and are highly invasive tools.
During that time in New York, he made a series of new works that responded to the natural world in full-blown spring but also to the ways the pandemic was reshaping life and death. An exhibition of these works, titled Bloom, are on display at Pace Gallery in London.
In Pittsburgh, even the physical layout of the exhibition highlights the ubiquity and insidiousness of certain aspects of virtual life. The works are placed in three main spaces around the museum, and the intent is to mimic.
For us that was really important because it gives an idea of infiltration, Leers, the curator, said. The surveillance that happens through algorithms and photography is quite hidden and requires digging and sleuthing to find out how its working.
Someone wandering through the museum might stumble serendipitously on Paglens work, getting a glimpse of how the systems of surveillance are built seamlessly into the fabric of our everyday lives.
© 2020 The New York Times Company