NEW YORK, NY.-
This winter and spring The Frick Collection
presents an exhibition of nine iconic Impressionist paintings by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, offering the first comprehensive study of the artists engagement with the full-length format. Its use was associated with the official Paris Salon from the mid-1870s to mid-1880s, the decade that saw the emergence of a fully fledged Impressionist aesthetic. The project was inspired by Renoirs La Promenade of 187576, the most significant Impressionist work in the Fricks permanent collection. Intended for public display, the vertical grand-scale canvases in the exhibition are among the artists most daring and ambitious presentations of contemporary subjects and are today considered masterpieces of Impressionism. The show and accompanying catalogue draw on contemporary criticism, literature, and archival documents to explore the motivation behind Renoirs full-length figure paintings as well as their reception by critics, peers, and the public. Recently-undertaken technical studies of the canvases will also shed new light on the artists working methods. Works on loan from international institutions are La Parisienne from the National Museum Wales, Cardiff; The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies) from The National Gallery, London (first time since 1886 on view in the United States); and Dance in the City and Dance in the Country from the Musée dOrsay, Paris. Paintings coming from American institutions are The Dancer from the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.; Madame Henriot en travesti (The Page) from the Columbus Museum of Art; Acrobats at the Cirque Fernando (Francisca and Angelina Wartenberg) from The Art Institute of Chicago; and Dance at Bougival from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting will be presented in the Fricks East Gallery, marking the first time that this elegant space will be used in its entirety for a special exhibition. The exhibition is organized by Colin B. Bailey, Deputy Director and Peter Jay Sharp Chief Curator.
Comments Colin B. Bailey, This exhibition, five years in the making, is a remarkable opportunity for our public, who will never have seen these nine works together before. We are indebted to our generous lenders who have agreed to part with icons from Renoirs oeuvre, which are among their most popular and beloved works. With our colleagues, weve embraced the opportunity to consider this group of paintings in a new light, conducting fresh researchand in several cases new technical studieson these canvases. The assembling of such a group will enrich our understanding of Renoirs ambitions as a figure painter working in the Impressionist idiom. Although the exhibition has but one venue, we are pleased that it is accompanied by a publication that will add significantly to the literature on this artist. An extensive series of public programs is scheduled, and visitors to the Frick may enjoy companion video presentations in the nearby Multimedia Room.
Impressionist paintings tend to be relatively modest in scale, daring in viewpoint, impromptu in compositional structure, and of a bright tonality that, while acceptable today, caused distress among critics and collectors at the time. The painters who joined forces in Paris during the early 1870s to organize the Impressionist group exhibitions in defiance of the official Salonchief among whom were Renoir, Monet, Degas, Pissarro, and Cézanneenjoyed a certain notoriety at the Salons of the previous decade, garnering attention in the press and interest from dealers, as well as the occasional sale. To make an impact, these young artists were encouraged to paint works of a certain scale and vigor: works that today might be described as having wall power. The largescale format was especially congenial to Pierre-Auguste Renoir, who, as an eighteen-year-old apprentice, had painted full-length images of the Virgin and Child in imitation of stained glass windows on blinds manufactured for export to missionary churches. The young Renoir had also painted mural decorations in cafés, working directly on the walls. Between the mid-1870s and the mid-1880s, when he and the artists who came to be known as the Impressionists were constructing a new pictorial language, Renoir continued to execute large figurative compositions in the time-honored tradition of the chef doeuvre. Between 1863 and 1883, Renoir submitted works to the Salon every year but three; in 1874, 1876, and 1877 he showed his paintings in the Impressionist group exhibitions.
The Dancer and La Parisienne, both in the exhibition, were among the seven works that he submitted to the First Impressionist Exhibition, in April 1874. These may be considered the earliest examples of the artist painting quickly on a large scale. Both are executed with visible brushwork on canvases prepared with light grounds, and in both traces of impasto alternate with the most summary application of color. In The Dancer, Renoirs chestnut-haired, blue-eyed ballerinaa trainee rat de lopéra is shown posing on the diagonal floorboards of the practice room, with the back of her voluminous tutu flaring up behind her. Renoirs bright palette, so familiar to us today, would have struck contemporaries as audacious, even transgressive. The girls neck, clavicle, and shoulder are modeled in blue; the shadows on her upperleft arm are rendered in green; and the flesh tones throughout are inflected with touches of blue, green, and yellow. Despite the speed with which Renoir worked and his lack of conventional finish, he was attentive to details such as the black velvet choker that continues down the dancers neck and the blue jeweled gold bracelet on her wrist.
La Parisienne reminds us that Renoir, more than any other Impressionist, was fascinated by Paris fashions, especially female fashion. His father was a tailor, his mother was a seamstress, and he kept abreast of the latest trends. In the early 1870s bright blues and mauves were in high fashion, as were the shaped bodice, bustle skirt, and pleated hem. Here Renoir presented his pert subject dressed from head to foot in an outdoor morning toilette of striking blue silk with matching toque, choker, and fur-trimmed gloves. Initially Renoir may have intended to present his model in a more defined setting, since he appears to have laid in background elements such as a doorway or column at left (subsequently painted out), and there are also indistinct shapes in the background on the right-hand side. Although La Parisienne is not, strictly speaking, a portrait, it was most likely modeled for by the seventeen- year-old Marie-Henriette-Alphonsine Grossin, an aspiring actress who had adopted the stage name of Mademoiselle Henriot. Modeling for Renoir may have helped Henriot to gain exposure as well as pay the rent, and between 1874 and 1876 she posed for five of his most ambitious full-length pictures, including La Promenade. Not a particularly beautiful woman, Henriot was transformed by Renoirs benevolent eye into a charming and welcoming presence in all these full-length paintings.
La Promenade, the centerpiece of Renoirs submission to the Second Impressionist Exhibition, which opened in March 1876, shows an elegantly attired young woman with magnificent light-brown hair shepherding a pair of identically dressed sisters along the path of a well-maintained public garden. All three figures are dressed for the cold weather. The eldest wears a blue velvet jacket, or paletot, with wide sleeves trimmed with red fox; her gathered skirt is of more simple material, probably cotton, and the edge of her white petticoat shows through at lower right. The young womans paletot is tied at the neck by a dark blue ribbon, and she wears a heavily starched collar and cuffs. The ensemble is completed by a frilly white silk bonnet with a blue silk ribbon and trimmings of lace and artificial roses. The little girls wear miniature blue-green paletots, possibly of cashmere, trimmed with either swans down or white mink, with matching skirts and fur-trimmed silk toques. Delicate lace cuffs peek out from the sleeves of their jackets and their underskirts are also trimmed with lace.
Behind this principal group, further up the pathway to the right, Renoir has included no fewer than eleven additional figures and two playful dogs. Vigorously and confidently painted, La Promenade is exemplary of Renoirs ambitions to create solidly modeled figural compositions in the newly enfranchised Impressionist style. A range of touches and techniques is apparent, from the quickly painted, washlike bands of color that demarcate the wintry trees and pathway of the background, to the abbreviated, sketchy manner of the secondary groups at upper right. Renoirs handling is at its most delicate in the construction of the young womans face, where the pinks and whites are suavely integrated and the eyelashes are delineated in tiny strokes of blue. To Renoirs dismay, most critics ignored his ambitious figure painting of winter fashions; those who commented on it at any length did so unfavorably. The most hostile review came from Arthur Baignères, for whom Renoirs figures were little more than imperceptible clouds. Although La Promenade failed to find a buyer for many years, Renoir remained committed to exploring issues of modernity, fashion, and the grandeur of Parisian life in the full-length and large-scale horizontal formats.
One of his most ambitious full-length paintings of these years is The Umbrellas, a work probably begun in the autumn of 1881. This multifigured composition was undertaken without a client or destination in mind; by the time it was finished, in 1885, Renoirs style had evolved from the luminous palette and feathery handling of Impressionism to the more linear and muted handling associated with his Ingresque period. Six principal figures dominate the foreground; behind them appear innumerable heads and shoulders and at least twelve umbrellas in a seemingly endless vista. The group on the right consists of an elegantly attired mother accompanied by her two daughters. On the left, a tall young modiste, or milliners assistant, carries a cane bandbox over her left arm. In the background, various diminutive figures, all in hats, raise their umbrellas. The trees at upper left, in full leaf but with touches of brown, might suggest springtime or early autumn. The location of the scene is also ambiguous: from the sea of umbrellas emerge the roof of a kiosk faintly outlined in red at upper left and the blue-gray façade of a distant apartment building at upper right. These are the sole indicators of the modern Parisian boulevard.
It has long been recognized that The Umbrellas was painted in two stages, at least four years apart. Renoir initially may have conceived of his painting as a frieze of fashionably dressed women of different ages and classes shown in an elegant Parisian park. His reworking of the canvas in 1885 led him to adjust the two figures on the left and to include the many supporting figures in the background as well as all the umbrellas. The disjunctions of facture and fashion that made The Umbrellas difficult to sell during Renoirs life have assumed different values over time. The juxtaposition of modern and old-fashioned clothing has become far less noticeable and is remarked upon, if at all, only by specialists. The stylistic incongruities in the composition have become more striking and impose themselves immediately upon modern audiences, for the majority of whom Umbrellas is a work of incomparable charm and appeal. Renoir may have been encouraged to complete this half-finished composition in the autumn of 1885 so that it could be included in the first survey of Impressionism for an American audience, organized by his dealer Paul Durand-Ruel. The Umbrellas was one of thirty-eight paintings by Renoir in the exhibition, which opened in New York on April 10, 1886. Retitled Rain in Paris, it was shown with eleven of Renoirs most ambitious figure paintings at the American Art Galleries on Madison Square South and East 23rd Street. The critic of The Art Amateur noted that the main gallery was almost given up to M. Renoir, whom he considered a remarkable painter, even though he spoiled several of his pictures by tawdry backgrounds and accessories. A more philistine review appeared in the Brooklyn Eagle a day after the exhibition opened, which ridiculed the event as the funniest performance to be seen in New York.
Renoirs struggle to complete The Umbrellas is all the more difficult to understand in light of his extraordinarily productive winter and early spring of 1883. Galvanized by the deadline of a solo exhibition of his work, he embarked on a trio of monumental dance pictures (all of which are in the exhibition) that rank among his most ambitious and perfectly realized Impressionist figure paintings: Dance in the City, Dance in the Country, and Dance at Bougival. Dance in the City shows a young couple waltzing alone in a marble salon. The young woman, her hair in a chignon adorned with a single pink rose, is wearing a toilette de bal of white satin or silk taffeta. Here Renoir posed two of his friends: the artist and habituée of Montmartre Suzanne Valadon and the handsome journalist Paul Lhote. The companion painting, Dance in the Country shows a couple dancing on the terrace of an outdoor restaurant, with chestnut trees in the background. The dancers have presumably just left their table, which is covered by a small tablecloth and set with napkins, a cup and spoon, and a half-filled decanter and glass. Lhote posed again for the dancer in a dark woolen lounge suit; his red-cheeked, partner, with a wider countenance than her counterpart in Dance in the City, wears a printed cotton tunic dress. The model for this figure was the twenty-three-year-old Aline Charigot, Renoirs mistress of three years, who would bear the first of their three sons in March 1885.
Dance at Bougival is Renoirs most romantic work in this trilogy: the tender yet passionate pose of the dancing couple conveys an ardor and eroticism that are almost palpable. Eyes masked by his boatmans straw hat, the male dancer expresses his intentions through a body language that is as legible today as it would have been more than a century ago. His companions willing compliance completes the harmony, both visual and sensual, that is at the heart of this painting, while the touching of ungloved hands and proximity of the dancers faces would have appeared audacious to a late nineteenth-century audience. Executed in his Paris studio, Dance at Bougivalof the same height but wider than the pair of companion paintingsachieves the luminosity of Renoirs earlier experiments en plein air while maintaining the solidity of modeling that characterized his most recent portraits and figure paintings. Renoirs technique is both sufficiently deft to evoke the easy sociability of the supporting cast in the background while fixing our attention on the central couple.
Recently taken X-radiography and infrared reflectography reveal, quite unexpectedly, that Renoir started out with a different model for his female dancer. The X-ray shows a round-faced woman, with coarser features and a heavier body, whose downcast head is placed more squarely on her shoulders and at less of an angle to that of her partner. It transpires then that the female dancer in Dance at Bougival started life looking a lot more like Aline Charigot, who had posed for Dance in the Country. As the painting progressed, Renoir seems to have enlisted the services of Suzanne Valadon, the protagonist of Dance in the City. In fact, the radiant young dancer with her splendid red hat is something of an amalgam of these two female dancers. As for her partner, traditionally identified as Paul Lhotethe male figure in the companion dance panelsit must be acknowledged that Renoir took considerable license in transforming his dark beard and mustache into those of a blonder variety. In fact, a more likely candidate for the burly auburn-bearded dancer in Dance at Bougival is the thirty-four-year-old Hippolyte-Alphonse Fournaise, son of the owner of the restaurant Fournaise, who assisted in the running of his familys dining establishment and boat-rental business in Chatou.
Ultimately, the full-length format was eschewed by most of his fellow Impressionists as too traditional. Renoir, meanwhile, continued to paint large scale works, enjoying for several more years the opportunity to devote himself to the heroic painting of everyday life, and also to linger on the finest details of his figures fashionable costumes and accessories. Today these works are among the most iconic and beloved of his oeuvre.
Principal funding for the exhibition is provided by The Florence Gould Foundation and Michel David-Weill. Additional support is generously provided by The Philip and Janice Levin Foundation, The Grand Marnier Foundation, and the Pierre and Tana Matisse Foundation. Corporate support is provided by Fiduciary Trust Company International. The exhibition is also supported by an indemnity from the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities.